Friday, February 22, 2013
Winter Storm "Q"
It
is not often we write on the actual inner workings of the legislature – we
often talk about the ideas and policies being proposed, debated, passed or
defeated. But this week, leadership of
the House and the Senate faced extraordinary circumstances. Though we had planned for a routine week –
amending bills on Tuesday and Wednesday and then passing the final versions on
Thursday – Mother Nature had other things in mind.
Early
on Tuesday we started hearing about the impending Winter Storm “Q”. As time progressed, it became clear that “Q”
was not going to be a light dusting of snow.
The Capitol and most of Missouri was likely to see a range of wintery
conditions from freezing rain to snow.
It was clear that a decision on whether or not to ask legislators and
staff to remain at the Capitol through the rest of the week had to be made.
I
wrote to you last week about public safety being the chief concern of
government. With this in mind, we
decided that we could not guarantee the safety of the hundreds of legislators
who drive in from across the entire state and the staff who support us here in
Jefferson City should we continue with our planned business. We adjourned on Wednesday for the remainder
of the week and asked legislators to be mindful of the storm as they planned
their weekends. We also granted an
internal holiday for staff on Thursday so they could stay at home with their
families as schools would likely be closed and roads in nearby cities would be
dangerous to travel.
As
I woke early on Thursday I was reassured we made the right decision. Kansas City alone saw record levels of
snow. Some parts of Missouri were
spared, but I-70 was at a standstill during parts of the day and I have heard
accounts of the many abandoned cars dotting Highways 63, 54, and 50 (three main
arteries to Jefferson City used by our staff and members). The legislature’s business is important, but
not so important that we risk the safety of the hundreds who come to work and
serve at your State Capitol.
Protecting our Fundamental Rights
The
Second Amendment to the United State Constitution states:
“A
well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the
right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.”
You
have probably heard a lot of talk in the past few months, especially this past
week, about all the different tactics being proposed by Democrats in D.C., and
now Missouri, that not only violate, but actually eradicate, our second
amendment rights.
One
of the most appalling attacks, HB 545, came late last week from Rep. Rory
Ellinger (D-86). House Bill 545 is one of the most preposterous anti-gun bills
filed this year as it would turn many law-abiding gun owners into felons. This
infringement would ban the possession, sale, transfer or manufacturing of
certain semi-automatic rifles and magazines that are capable of holding more
than ten rounds. It contains no grandfather clause, which means if you are currently
in possession of the semi-automatic rifles and magazines outlined in this bill,
you will have 90 days from the effective date of this legislation to surrender,
destroy or remove these currently lawful items from Missouri. If you fail to do
so, you could be charged with a Class C felony.
Here
in Missouri, the Republican led legislature is dedicated to upholding and
protecting the fundamental rights of our citizens as outlined in the
Constitution. Legislation that is clearly an infringement on our Constitution
deserves nothing but a swift and public execution.
One
piece of legislation being proposed in the House to protect the rights of
Missourians is HB 170 called the "Firearm Protection Act", sponsored
by Rep. Casey Guernsey (R-2). This legislation is designed to shield our
citizens from President Obama's gun control mandates, executive orders and
proposed legislation that would limit our fundamental Second Amendment rights.
The Firearm Protection Act specifies that no official shall enforce a federal
firearm law when the firearm is manufactured and remains in the state and that
any new federal law banning or restricting ownership of a semi-automatic
firearm is unenforceable. In addition the legislation would make any attempt to
curb a Missourian’s Second Amendment rights a class D felony and directs the
Attorney General of the State of Missouri to defend Missouri citizen's rights
to keep and bear arms.
Missouri
legislators believe it is their fundamental responsibility to defend and
protect Missourians’ basic constitutional rights framed in both the US and
Missouri Constitutions.
House Advances Tax Amnesty Program
The
Missouri House voted to send the Senate a new revenue policy being championed
by budget hawk Representative Tom Flanigan (R-Carthage). Rep. Flanigan initially proposed the idea of
tax amnesty in the 2011 legislative session as a way to help increase revenues
without raising taxes. I think it is an
intelligent idea and it will help us fund many critical services.
How does it work?
Upon
its passage and the Governor’s signature, the Department of Revenue will begin
working to advertise and implement the necessary program requirements to offer
the general public an amnesty opportunity.
That is, if you owe back taxes, you can make arrangements with the
Department to pay them with all interest and penalties will be waived.
What if the taxpayer fails to pay?
Rep.
Flanigan and the rest of the Republican-led legislature understand that some
folks want to make right on their tax bills.
But we also know that we can’t provide amnesty without expecting
taxpayers to continue to pay their taxes just like their neighbors, you, and
I. We added some safeguards to encourage
those who have a debt to pay it, but also to ensure they don’t fall back into
the red later down the road. In fact, if
in any of the eight years after a taxpayer participates in the amnesty program
they fall behind again, all prior interest and penalties will be
reapplied. Additionally, language was
added that will ensure that a taxpayer who receives amnesty on a certain tax
will not be able to participate in any future amnesty programs for that same
tax. We think this is a good way to
encourage positive changes, be considerate of those burdened by tough times
from the recession, and bring folks up to par and paying their fair share like
their neighbors.
How much will the state generate?
Estimates
have ranged from $55 million to more than $70 million in additional revenues
that the state will receive if it offers the amnesty program. Those funds will help balance the budget
without a tax increase – a promise you’ve asked for, we’ve made, and we
continue to keep.
Friday, February 15, 2013
Bonding Issue, Continued...
Recently, I wrote to you about a bond proposal that
will help the state repair its infrastructure.
Whether transportation, higher-education, or state facility related, our
infrastructure provides the necessary framework for a stable, prosperous
economy. The condition of our
infrastructure demands action – today.
In response, I have proposed a bipartisan solution: House Joint
Resolution 14. This Resolution, labeled
“Funding
for Higher Education, Improvements, Construction, and Transportation
Infrastructure”, will provide the funding necessary to accomplish the task we
have at hand.
Because of the magnitude of this undertaking, I formed the Appropriations Committee on Infrastructure and Job Creation chaired by Representative Chris Kelly; a strong advocate for bonding and a senior member of the democrat party in the House of Representatives. In short, the responsibility of the 17 member committee will be oversight of all use of funding generated through the bond issue.
This investment in our state will contribute to more advanced education in our higher learning centers around the state. It is imperative we are able to educate our students to meet the technological demands placed upon them now, and in the future. An educated workforce attracts investment in our state and spurs economic growth. As the economy in Missouri improves, revenue to the state increases. This means more funds will be available to fund other critical state service, which keeps taxes low.
As the Third State Building Bond did in the years following its approval, voter approval for the Fifth State Building Fund will provide the necessary funding for our infrastructure needs, help to insure an educated workforce, and spur economic growth and opportunity in Missouri. The 1982 bond issuance was responsible for creating an estimated 40,000 plus jobs. This is clearly a win-win situation.
Whether the bond issuance directly pays for repairs to our transportation infrastructure or frees up state funds for the repairs, we desperately need to make the necessary repairs and improvements to our highways and bridges. It is estimated the average driver will pay around $540 in auto repairs every year due to poor conditions of our roads and bridges. Interstate 70 is a prime example of our infrastructure needs. Designed to support 18,000 vehicles per day, the least travelled sections now experience 31,000 vehicles daily; nearly twice the number it was designed to carry. These numbers will continue to increase as our population continues to grow. A clogged highway system - in desperate need of repair - creates unsafe driving conditions for you and your family.
Poor transportation infrastructure also negatively impacts trade. Nationally, we stand to lose $72 billion annually in foreign trade alone due to these deficiencies. The economic impact is staggering to think about. We must take the initiative now to right this ship and prepare our transportation infrastructure to accept the demands being placed upon it now, and for the foreseeable future. We cannot, in good conscience, continue to deny funding for the critical repairs and improvements to our roads and bridges.
This is the right thing to do for your safety, the safety of your family, and makes good economic sense. This bond issue is a clear example of how responsible borrowing to fund capital improvements can truly better a society – we will not adopt the “Washington Model” of “over-borrow to force tax increases.” We will live within our means and we will balance the budget. Always.
Because of the magnitude of this undertaking, I formed the Appropriations Committee on Infrastructure and Job Creation chaired by Representative Chris Kelly; a strong advocate for bonding and a senior member of the democrat party in the House of Representatives. In short, the responsibility of the 17 member committee will be oversight of all use of funding generated through the bond issue.
Benefits
This investment in our state will contribute to more advanced education in our higher learning centers around the state. It is imperative we are able to educate our students to meet the technological demands placed upon them now, and in the future. An educated workforce attracts investment in our state and spurs economic growth. As the economy in Missouri improves, revenue to the state increases. This means more funds will be available to fund other critical state service, which keeps taxes low.
As the Third State Building Bond did in the years following its approval, voter approval for the Fifth State Building Fund will provide the necessary funding for our infrastructure needs, help to insure an educated workforce, and spur economic growth and opportunity in Missouri. The 1982 bond issuance was responsible for creating an estimated 40,000 plus jobs. This is clearly a win-win situation.
Whether the bond issuance directly pays for repairs to our transportation infrastructure or frees up state funds for the repairs, we desperately need to make the necessary repairs and improvements to our highways and bridges. It is estimated the average driver will pay around $540 in auto repairs every year due to poor conditions of our roads and bridges. Interstate 70 is a prime example of our infrastructure needs. Designed to support 18,000 vehicles per day, the least travelled sections now experience 31,000 vehicles daily; nearly twice the number it was designed to carry. These numbers will continue to increase as our population continues to grow. A clogged highway system - in desperate need of repair - creates unsafe driving conditions for you and your family.
Poor transportation infrastructure also negatively impacts trade. Nationally, we stand to lose $72 billion annually in foreign trade alone due to these deficiencies. The economic impact is staggering to think about. We must take the initiative now to right this ship and prepare our transportation infrastructure to accept the demands being placed upon it now, and for the foreseeable future. We cannot, in good conscience, continue to deny funding for the critical repairs and improvements to our roads and bridges.
This is the right thing to do for your safety, the safety of your family, and makes good economic sense. This bond issue is a clear example of how responsible borrowing to fund capital improvements can truly better a society – we will not adopt the “Washington Model” of “over-borrow to force tax increases.” We will live within our means and we will balance the budget. Always.
For a complete description of my HJR 14 and the
Joint Committee on Capital Improvements and Leases Oversight, please visit www.house.mo.gov.
Protecting Public Safety While Honoring Public Interest
This week the House of Representatives considered
and moved forward HB 256 sponsored by Representative Caleb Jones (R-50). One of the chief concerns the legislature has
is public safety. In fact, it is the
government’s primary responsibility to facilitate the sanctity of its citizens’
rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. With this in mind, the House extended the law
which protects certain government plans from the public domain so long as they
relate to public safety. Specifically,
disaster response plans that are developed in the event of terrorist activities
and utilized by law enforcement agencies, public health and public safety
officials will not be accessible. Many
had concerns that school disaster response plans would be publicly available,
meaning that those wishing our children harm might also have access to how
first responders, police, and other safety officials would handle a crisis –
allowing the criminal more time to do harm or plan escape.
Let me be clear, I strongly support the public’s
interest in accountability in government.
In an effort to ensure that government officials could not tamper with
the intent of the law in order to hide activities or purchases that would erode
the public’s trust, I also supported amendments that clarified that certain
purchases and activities can explicitly be obtained through information
requests from the public. This issue is
quite complex, and the line between public safety and public information is sometimes
a hard one to define. I feel confident
that we have acted in the best interest of Missouri’s citizens.
Protecting the Vote
Our founding fathers envisioned a government that
worked for the people, not against them.
Needless to say, they would probably not be too satisfied with the mess
that is the Washington, D.C. of today.
As the Washington insiders and career politicians continue to lose touch
with what the people really desire and deserve from their government; I like to
think that closer to home here in Jefferson City, we are keeping the founding
fathers’ vision alive. Just this week, the Missouri House passed a key measure
that ensures that our state government is a service to the people of this great
state.
On Thursday, February 14 the House Third Read and Passed HCS HB 48 & 216 and HCS HJRs 5 & 12, sponsored by Rep. Tony Dugger (R-Hartsville). This legislation requires a person to submit a specified form of photo identification in order to vote in a public election. HCS HJRs 5 & 12 creates a Voter ID ballot measure for approval of the people and HCS HBs 48 & 216 is the statutory laws that would govern Voter ID should the ballot measure prevail.
The goal of these proposals is to protect the
sanctity and integrity of the election process, not to restrict anyone from
voting. Acceptable forms of
identification under these measures include: non-expired Missouri driver’s or
non-driver’s license; a document issued by the federal or state government that
contains the individual’s name, signature, photograph and expiration date; or a
photo ID issued by the National Guard, US Armed Forces or US Department of
Veterans Affairs. There are also provisions in the statutes that would help
Missourians who might not have or be able to afford an ID obtain a proper form
of identification. Even still, a voter
can cast a provisional ballot should they not have the required identification –
allowing everyone to partake in the democratic process while safeguarding
against voter fraud.
Monday, February 11, 2013
Up From the Ashes
On the rather
ordinary Sunday evening of February 5, 1911, the dome of the Missouri Capitol
was struck by lightning a third and final time. The capitol had survived direct
hits in 1901 and 1904 but it was the last strike in 1911 that proved to be more
than the people’s capitol could withstand. Accounts from that evening describe
in horror the frantic and chaotic actions of the citizens as they tried to
contain the blaze. Even then-Governor Hadley, in one last desperate attempt,
took up a hose but fought in vain as fire consumed the building.
One newspaper account described the scene as such:
“When
the last bit of woodwork had fallen from the dome, leaving the barren steel
framework blood-red with heat, the blaze scurried along the great roof. The
flame divided, one fork worked to the north while the other ignited the top of
the south wing…”
After all was
over and the fire but smoldering embers, the capitol was left an ashen husk
standing on the horizon. Yet out of the destruction, the citizens of Missouri
rebuilt this cathedral of democracy. It was built to withstand the forces of
nature and be an anchor for which all Missourians could moor their right of
self-government.
So on this 102nd
anniversary of the burning of the Missouri’s state capitol, we must remember
that our ideals are not found in the buildings we erect but in the hearts of
the people. We can always rebuild a fallen and destroyed structure, but it is
far more difficult to rebuild a free society when the ideals that have guided
us through history are ravaged by forces greater than mere lightning that may
erupt across the sky. Our resolve is strengthened and made anew by the fires of
passion and through an embrace of the notion that the welfare of the people is
the supreme law of the land.
Better Solutions
One of the
hottest topics so far this session has been and will continue to be Healthcare
Reform. I think the voters made their message loud and clear during the last
election that they do not want any new taxes and they do not support
drastically expanding the already broken program that is Medicaid. The Governor
has promised not to raise any of Missouri’s taxes, yet concedes that the state
will be liable for hundreds of millions in new spending through his Medicaid
expansion. He has not offered a plan of how to pay for the expansion so we are
left to conclude he plans to take money from places like corrections, mental
health or education (his target last year). Medicaid was designed to help the
neediest, such as children and those with special needs. It should not be
diluted.
We will not
ignore the needs of our less-fortunate citizens and will be working diligently
to offer and pass the best solutions for Missouri. One such plan to assist
Missouri’s most vulnerable citizens was passed in the House this week with
nearly unanimous bipartisan support. House Bill 87 sponsored by Rep. Eric
Burlison (R-Springfield) re-establishes or extends the sunset date on many Benevolent
Tax Credits to December 31, 2019. The tax credits impacted by this legislation
include the income tax credit for the surviving spouse of a public safety
officer who has not remarried, the children in crisis tax credit, the
disability access residential renovations tax credit, the pregnancy resource
center tax credit, and the income tax credit for a donation to a food pantry.
These tax
credits encourage investments, from private citizens, in programs that benefit
many of our most needy citizens. HB 87 will help many of our charitable
organizations gather resources to provide much needed assistance to low-income
families. These benevolent tax credits are a fiscally responsible way of
assisting Missourians who are in need.
Times are tough in Missouri and all across our Nation. However, encouraging private citizens to support the many charitable organizations who are providing much needed resources to pregnant women and hungry children is good public policy. It is not just the smart thing to do; it is the right thing to do.
Governor’s Proposal Just Makes Things Worse
I glanced at
the U.S. Debt Clock on Tuesday afternoon.
If each taxpayer in the country had to make a one-time payment to
collectively pay off the federal debt, that amount would be $146,080. So here is my question: “Do you have over a
hundred thousand dollars you and your family do not need?” Odds are you do not. Democrats like to contribute our fiscal
problems to a “lack” of revenue. They
tell you that they can solve so many problems if only they had more of your
money with which to spend. They then
sell you the idea that Republicans are evil because we oppose mortgaging a
collective generation of children’s – even grandchildren’s – futures for the
sake of poorly run programs that do not even come close to solving the problems
they were intended to solve. One such
program is Medicaid.
Old, Broken Medicaid
Have you ever
heard anyone say that Medicaid is a good insurance program? I have not and I am willing to bet you have
not either. Medicaid is such a terribly
run inefficient program that one-third of doctors nationwide will not even take
on new Medicaid patients. Studies also
show that Medicaid recipients have worse health outcomes than those who have
private insurance. There is even
evidence that shows that on par, a Medicaid recipient is actually more likely
to go visit the emergency room than someone who is uninsured. This is the exact opposite of the intended
effect the program is supposed to have!
Specialty care, which is expensive and often crucial to treating our
medically underserved, is limited by Medicaid’s burdensome federal regulations
and requirements. When it comes to
access and outcomes, Medicaid is failing.
This underlying
truth is undeniable and uncontested. Yet
this is the program that Governor Nixon wants to saddle on to more than 250,000
additional Missourians. According
to the 2011 American Community Survey, 86.3% of Missouri’s citizens have some
form of insurance. With this expansion,
we only improve the coverage to 90% - a mere 4% increase in coverage (assuming
no one drops their private insurance for “free” healthcare) for a staggering
cost to taxpayers of one billion dollars!
Common sense could not be more in our favor to reform this system to
improve its operation, help people get well, and save taxpayer dollars.
Unfortunately, this
is not the plan Governor Nixon is endorsing.
Consider this: in the last four years as Governor, he has had the
opportunity to try and change Medicaid so it actually helps people get
well. Instead, he has waited until his re-election
before he jumped on the expansion bandwagon.
Thankfully, there are alternatives to the ill-conceived idea of growing this
broken system.
Transformed Medicaid
Republicans and
Democrats alike in places like Florida, Louisiana, Kansas, Texas, and Wisconsin
have taken notice of Medicaid’s vast shortcomings. Instead of just throwing more money at the
problem, these states have offered realistic solutions. With a pragmatic approach, they have
instituted reforms that have promoted stronger patient outcomes, increased
doctor participation, and reduced burdensome restrictions on care that can be
given. We can bring those solutions to
Missouri and that is what we will be working towards this session.
Friday, February 1, 2013
The Right Thing To Do
Governor Nixon
delivered his annual State of the State address this week, highlighting his
newfound liberal stance on entitlement programs – specifically Medicaid. He is advocating for a billion dollar
increase in the Missouri budget to expand a broken program that is already
filled with waste, fraud and abuse.
Auditor Schweich’s recently released audit proves the fact that welfare
programs remain rife with improper spending and abuse. Those are facts. The Governor’s talking points, which certain
liberal editorial boards have parroted across the state, are supposedly: 1)
“It’s the right thing to do.” and 2) “It’s the smart thing to do.” This is the depth of his argument. For $1 billion of your hard earned tax
dollars, I expect more details and you should, too.
I oppose the expansion of this entitlement and here’s why:
Governor Nixon may find it easy to just say “It’s the right thing to do,” but I’m here to make responsible decisions. I’m here to be realistic and pragmatic. Governor Nixon and his allies may feel comfortable trying to hoodwink the public into agreeing with their positions, but I’m here to be honest with you.
I oppose the expansion of this entitlement and here’s why:
A.
The
Missouri electorate has consistently reminded its government officials
that they will not accept tax increases, do not favor ObamaCare, nor have they
supported those who have promoted either.
i.
President
Obama lost Missouri in both of his elections
ii.
Governor
Nixon campaigned on no new taxes and never mentioned his support of ObamaCare
in his re-election bid
iii.
Proposition
C in 2010 overwhelmingly rejected ObamaCare to the tune of 70% of the vote
iv.
Proposition
B in 2012 (less than 12 weeks ago) proposed a tax increase on cigarettes to support
education programming – it failed
B.
None
of the politicians or advocates of the expansion have addressed how to pay for
the expansion once Missouri’s share kicks in – an amount that will cost you and
I hundreds of millions of dollars. Next
to spending on social programs, which comprises almost one-third of Missouri’s
current $24 billion budget, education is our largest expenditure. Our kids – our future job creators,
employers, researchers – will see less funding per capita in the classroom if
this short-sighted expansion moves forward.
C.
An
economic analysis of the impact of Medicaid expansion was released late last
year, and some have taken these figures as gospel. New jobs, they say. New taxes from new spending, they say. The problem with this analysis is glaring,
but unreported. It fails to account for
where the money will come from and what the underlying impact of taking it out
of your pocket will do to the economy.
This is not new money. It is
borrowed, and it will ultimately come from our taxpaying citizens and our
businesses. When they are forced to give
the government money, they can’t spend it in the private sector, invest it in
their own future, or save it for a rainy day.
Yet zero consideration for this huge, looming economic squeeze is
given. Let us not forget our federal
government is making fiscal promises without passing a budget and by borrowing
$0.40 of every $1.00.
Governor Nixon may find it easy to just say “It’s the right thing to do,” but I’m here to make responsible decisions. I’m here to be realistic and pragmatic. Governor Nixon and his allies may feel comfortable trying to hoodwink the public into agreeing with their positions, but I’m here to be honest with you.
I will not
support this short-sighted, bankrupt idea.
The right thing to do is to support limited government, better tax
policy, and growth strategies that will encourage entrepreneurship and economic
development. The right thing to do is
transform the Medicaid program to improve access, care delivery, and overall
healthier outcomes. It’s not just the right thing, but also the smart thing to
do.
Governor Rolls the Dice with Education Funding
On Monday, we
heard many grandiose promises from the Governor relating to new policies he is
supporting and the budget he is proposing to support those promises. On some of his broad-based ideas, we find
common ground. However, upon a closer
examination of what few specifics he offered, it is becoming clear that he has
made promises that are a gamble and could require massive new taxes and
spending that Missourians are likely to be more than skeptical about when they
see the numbers. What is worse is that
many of these promises will come at the expense of the prosperity of the next
generation.
You heard this week that the Governor is proposing that the A+ program will be taken statewide. What you didn’t hear is that the budget assumes this expansion will only cost $1 million more. How one assumes that a $30 million program only needs $1 million more to expand statewide is unreasonable and indefensible. This roll of the dice will not pay off and will cost the state far more than he suggests. We need to be honest with ourselves when we propose program expenditures. Moreover, we need to be honest with the people of Missouri.
You also heard that the Governor is adding $100 million to K-12 education in his budget. What you didn’t hear is that his budget relies on three key legislative proposals simultaneously being passed by the legislature that might bring in extra money. Only one of these proposals has ever been considered before the legislature and has a history of failing each year - common sense tells us what result we should expect again this year.
What Can We Realistically Expect?
The Republican-led legislature will be moving pragmatically forward over the coming days, weeks, and months to craft a budget that will be based on sounder judgment. We won’t make you promises that we know will likely fall through. This commitment to fiscal responsibility will have political consequences. You will hear that we are “cutting” money for kids or the disabled. What will actually be happening is a rational, fiscally-responsible, and honest appropriation of funds that the state will actually receive instead of money we dream it will receive. We will be forthcoming. We will be transparent. You deserve no less.
You heard this week that the Governor is proposing that the A+ program will be taken statewide. What you didn’t hear is that the budget assumes this expansion will only cost $1 million more. How one assumes that a $30 million program only needs $1 million more to expand statewide is unreasonable and indefensible. This roll of the dice will not pay off and will cost the state far more than he suggests. We need to be honest with ourselves when we propose program expenditures. Moreover, we need to be honest with the people of Missouri.
You also heard that the Governor is adding $100 million to K-12 education in his budget. What you didn’t hear is that his budget relies on three key legislative proposals simultaneously being passed by the legislature that might bring in extra money. Only one of these proposals has ever been considered before the legislature and has a history of failing each year - common sense tells us what result we should expect again this year.
What Can We Realistically Expect?
The Republican-led legislature will be moving pragmatically forward over the coming days, weeks, and months to craft a budget that will be based on sounder judgment. We won’t make you promises that we know will likely fall through. This commitment to fiscal responsibility will have political consequences. You will hear that we are “cutting” money for kids or the disabled. What will actually be happening is a rational, fiscally-responsible, and honest appropriation of funds that the state will actually receive instead of money we dream it will receive. We will be forthcoming. We will be transparent. You deserve no less.
Bonding
By now I am sure you are well aware of
our intent here in the Missouri House of Representatives to promote a bonding
issue to fund renovations to our state’s infrastructure. As a strong fiscal conservative, with a
crystal clear record of promoting the principle of living within your means, my
decision to back the idea of bond issuance deserves a thorough explanation.
In 1982, then Governor Kit Bond was successful in his efforts to convince the Missouri Legislature and a majority of Missouri voters to agree to a bond issuance of $600 million in order to fund building and repair projects across the State of Missouri. The resounding success of this initiative can be seen all across our great state. The list of projects completed with this money is vast and includes, but is not limited to, the construction of the Western Missouri Correction Center, the Science Building at UMSL, the Mineral Engineering and Management Building at Missouri S&T, the Business Building at MSU, the Law School Building at UM-Columbia, the Business and Public Administration Building at UMKC, the Recreation Facility at MSU, the Agriculture Engineering Building at UM-Columbia, five group homes in Jackson County for the Department of Mental Health, the Multipurpose Recreational Facility at UMKC, the Major Events Facility at MSU, and the Health Sciences Library at UM-Columbia. As if this were not enough, this bond also paid for numerous additions, renovations, expansions, and maintenance/repair projects to existing facilities across the state. Furthermore, it provided funding necessary for soil and water conservation projects, storm water control grants, rural sewer and water system grants, and major park facility improvements. Having just completed the final payment on this bond and reflecting on what was accomplished; it is crystal clear that it is a success story worth repeating.
After reviewing all the aspects of this issue ranging from its positive economic impact, to the desperately needed improvements to outdated and failing infrastructure, to the historically low interest rates we enjoy as a state with a AAA credit rating, it is clear to me that this is the correct path for our state.
In next week’s report I will address how a bond issuance would directly, and positively, impact you and your family in the years to come.
In 1982, then Governor Kit Bond was successful in his efforts to convince the Missouri Legislature and a majority of Missouri voters to agree to a bond issuance of $600 million in order to fund building and repair projects across the State of Missouri. The resounding success of this initiative can be seen all across our great state. The list of projects completed with this money is vast and includes, but is not limited to, the construction of the Western Missouri Correction Center, the Science Building at UMSL, the Mineral Engineering and Management Building at Missouri S&T, the Business Building at MSU, the Law School Building at UM-Columbia, the Business and Public Administration Building at UMKC, the Recreation Facility at MSU, the Agriculture Engineering Building at UM-Columbia, five group homes in Jackson County for the Department of Mental Health, the Multipurpose Recreational Facility at UMKC, the Major Events Facility at MSU, and the Health Sciences Library at UM-Columbia. As if this were not enough, this bond also paid for numerous additions, renovations, expansions, and maintenance/repair projects to existing facilities across the state. Furthermore, it provided funding necessary for soil and water conservation projects, storm water control grants, rural sewer and water system grants, and major park facility improvements. Having just completed the final payment on this bond and reflecting on what was accomplished; it is crystal clear that it is a success story worth repeating.
After reviewing all the aspects of this issue ranging from its positive economic impact, to the desperately needed improvements to outdated and failing infrastructure, to the historically low interest rates we enjoy as a state with a AAA credit rating, it is clear to me that this is the correct path for our state.
In next week’s report I will address how a bond issuance would directly, and positively, impact you and your family in the years to come.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)