Old, Broken Medicaid
Have you ever
heard anyone say that Medicaid is a good insurance program? I have not and I am willing to bet you have
not either. Medicaid is such a terribly
run inefficient program that one-third of doctors nationwide will not even take
on new Medicaid patients. Studies also
show that Medicaid recipients have worse health outcomes than those who have
private insurance. There is even
evidence that shows that on par, a Medicaid recipient is actually more likely
to go visit the emergency room than someone who is uninsured. This is the exact opposite of the intended
effect the program is supposed to have!
Specialty care, which is expensive and often crucial to treating our
medically underserved, is limited by Medicaid’s burdensome federal regulations
and requirements. When it comes to
access and outcomes, Medicaid is failing.
This underlying
truth is undeniable and uncontested. Yet
this is the program that Governor Nixon wants to saddle on to more than 250,000
additional Missourians. According
to the 2011 American Community Survey, 86.3% of Missouri’s citizens have some
form of insurance. With this expansion,
we only improve the coverage to 90% - a mere 4% increase in coverage (assuming
no one drops their private insurance for “free” healthcare) for a staggering
cost to taxpayers of one billion dollars!
Common sense could not be more in our favor to reform this system to
improve its operation, help people get well, and save taxpayer dollars.
Unfortunately, this
is not the plan Governor Nixon is endorsing.
Consider this: in the last four years as Governor, he has had the
opportunity to try and change Medicaid so it actually helps people get
well. Instead, he has waited until his re-election
before he jumped on the expansion bandwagon.
Thankfully, there are alternatives to the ill-conceived idea of growing this
broken system.
Transformed Medicaid
Republicans and
Democrats alike in places like Florida, Louisiana, Kansas, Texas, and Wisconsin
have taken notice of Medicaid’s vast shortcomings. Instead of just throwing more money at the
problem, these states have offered realistic solutions. With a pragmatic approach, they have
instituted reforms that have promoted stronger patient outcomes, increased
doctor participation, and reduced burdensome restrictions on care that can be
given. We can bring those solutions to
Missouri and that is what we will be working towards this session.
No comments:
Post a Comment