During
a web-cam abortion, a doctor can sit in front of a computer at a remote
location – even in another state – and give the thumbs up for the
abortifacient, RU-486, to be administered by a nurse. A woman takes the first
dose of this drug, which starves the baby, at the office. She then is sent home
with a second pill that induces labor.
The
tragedy is that women seeking abortions of any kind are already in a difficult
situation. Proponents of chemical abortions say that women can expel their baby
surrounded by who they choose. But the truth is these women are often alone.
Web-cam abortions only intensify that isolation. If complications arise because
of the side effects that RU-486 can cause, the woman has no trusted doctor to
call. Meanwhile, she is charged the same amount of money for the chemical
abortion as for a surgical abortion, while the clinic saves all the expense of
getting a doctor to come and supervise. Clinics are turning a profit at the
expense of women—that is unacceptable.
HB 400 is about protecting women’s health and safety. While it is tragic if a woman makes the choice to abort her baby, she should still have access to the utmost quality care of a physician. It is already heartbreaking to lose one life – why put the life of the woman at risk, too? One hundred and fifteen members of the House of Representatives, in a veto proof bipartisan manner, agree and have sent this bill to the Senate.
No comments:
Post a Comment